2012 Chevrolet Camaro review
Chevrolet Camaro highlights
Customer rating
Pros
- Strong acceleration with V6 and V8 engines
- Good fuel economy from the V6
- Capable handling
Cons
- Difficult to see out of
- Cramped rear seat
- Undersized trunk with a small opening
Mileage (EPA estimate)
14 city, 19 highway, 16 combined
Pricing for current inventory
(no current inventory)
Shop with your budget in mind
Getting pre-qualified lets you shop with personalized monthly payments, and it doesn't impact your credit score.
The 2012 Chevy Camaro gets improved interior and more power
The 2012 Chevy Camaro’s looks make it stand out from the throwback designs of its muscle car competitors, while its combination of strong acceleration and sharp handling give it true sports car capabilities. The base V6 engine found on LS and LT trims is a strong performer in its own right. Step up to SS trims for the power and sound of a V8, or to the ZL1 for maximum performance from a supercharged V8 engine. The Camaro does have some notable downsides, including poor visibility, a cramped back seat, and a tiny trunk.
The 2012 model year marked the Camaro’s 45th anniversary, and it received a refreshed interior, more power for its V6 engine, an available backup camera, and an improved suspension for the SS Coupe. The Camaro ZL1 also became available for 2012 with a much more powerful V8 engine and other performance upgrades.
All Chevrolet Camaro years
Chevrolet Camaro photos
What We Like
Acceleration: Both the 323-horsepower standard V6 engine and the 426-horsepower V8 found in the Camaro SS are impressive performers. Step up to the ZL1 and you get a mind-blowing 580 horsepower. There’s not a slow option in the group, giving the Camaro true muscle-car cred.
Fuel-efficient V6: The 2012 Camaro’s V6 engine returns an EPA-estimated 19 mpg city and 29 mpg highway when paired with an automatic transmission. Contemporary V6 Mustangs just edge past the Chevy, but the Camaro’s fuel economy rating remains a strong showing for a sports car of the time.
Handling: The Camaro’s modern design isn’t just skin-deep. Compared to its top competitors in 2012, the Camaro offers more sophisticated ride and handling characteristics. That makes it more composed and more engaging to drive when the road gets twisty.
What Needs Improvement
Usability: The Camaro’s low-slung looks and aggressive proportions affect visibility and space. The car is more difficult to see out of than its competitors, and the tiny back seat and awkwardly small trunk mean there’s not much room for people or cargo.
Shop with your budget in mind
Getting pre-qualified lets you shop with personalized monthly payments, and it doesn't impact your credit score.
Ratings & reliability
Customer ratings
4.6 out of 5
33 customer reviews| 5 Stars | 24 |
|---|---|
| 4 Stars | 6 |
| 3 Stars | 2 |
| 2 Stars | 1 |
| 1 Star | 0 |
RepairPal gave the Chevrolet Camaro an overall reliability rating of 4 out of 5 stars, which RepairPal describes as Above Average. This rating ranks Chevrolet Camaro 21st out of 28 among Midsize Cars.
View RepairPal's full rating of the Chevrolet CamaroChevrolet Camaro features and specs
Curious how Chevrolet Camaro trims differ? Use our side-by-side vehicle comparison to see the differences and similarities
SS 2D Convertible 2WD
Standard Features
- Cloth Seats
- Rear View Camera
- Parking Sensors
- ABS Brakes
- Air Conditioning
- Cruise Control
- Power Locks
- Power Mirrors
- Power Seat(s)
- Power Windows
- Rear Defroster
- Side Airbags
- Traction Control
- 20 Inch Plus Wheels
- Alloy Wheels
- Rear Spoiler
- Soft Top
- Manual Transmission
- Bluetooth Technology
- AM/FM Stereo
- Auxiliary Audio Input
- CD Audio
- Satellite Radio Ready
- Front Seat Heaters
- Head Up Display
- Leather Seats
- Parking Sensors
- Rear View Camera
- Bluetooth Technology
- Boston Sound System
Drive Wheels
Rear wheel drive (2WD)
Engine size
6.2L
Horsepower
426
Torque (ft-lbs)
420
Engine type
Gas
Fuel capacity
19
Wheelbase
112.3"
Overall length
190.4"
Width
75.5"
Height
54.7"
Leg room
F 42.4"/R 29.9"
Head room
F 37.8"/R 35.7"
Front tires
P245/45R20
Rear tires
P275/40R20
Seating capacity
4
Transmission
Manual 6
2012 Chevrolet Camaro FAQ
The 2012 Chevrolet Camaro has received an average 4.6 out of 5 stars from our customers. If you're in the market for a 2012 Chevrolet Camaro, check out reviews from customers just like you. 2012 Chevrolet Camaro Reviews.
The Chevrolet Camaro received a rating of 4 out of 5 stars from RepairPal, which RepairPal describes as Above Average. This rating ranks the Chevrolet Camaro as 21 out of 28 among Midsize Car
Here are the pros and cons of the 2012 Chevrolet Camaro: Pros - Power - Ride and Handling - Styling Cons - Visibility - Interior Space - Cargo Space
The 2012 Chevrolet Camaro offers the following fuel efficiency options: • Gas: 16 city / 24 highway MPG (SS trim) • Gas: 17 city / 28 highway MPG (LT trim) • Gas: 14 city / 19 highway MPG (ZL1 trim) • Gas: 18 city / 29 highway MPG (LS trim) Actual mileage may vary based on driving conditions, vehicle condition, and driving habits.
Research other vehicles
- chevrolet camaro used car value
- 1994 chevrolet camaro used car value
- 1995 chevrolet camaro used car value
- 2012 chevrolet camaro used car value
- 2013 chevrolet camaro used car value
- 2014 chevrolet camaro used car value
- 2015 chevrolet camaro used car value
- 2016 chevrolet camaro used car value
- 2017 chevrolet camaro used car value
- 2018 chevrolet camaro used car value
- 2019 chevrolet camaro used car value
- 2020 chevrolet camaro used car value
- 2021 chevrolet camaro used car value
- 2022 chevrolet camaro used car value
- 2023 chevrolet camaro used car value
- 2018 Audi Q5 review
- 2020 Audi Q5 review
- 2016 BMW 740 review
- 2017 BMW 740 review
- 2018 BMW 740 review
- 2016 Cadillac CTS review
- 2017 Cadillac CTS review
- 2023 Chevrolet Blazer review
- 2024 Chevrolet Camaro review
- 2013 Chevrolet Camaro review
- 2016 Chevrolet Camaro review
- 2019 Chevrolet Camaro review
- 2020 Chevrolet Camaro review
- 2021 Chevrolet Camaro review
- All things EV
- 2021 Nissan NV 1500 review
- 2021 Nissan NV 200 review
- 2021 Nissan NV 2500 review
- 2020 Porsche Cayenne Hybrid review
- 2018 Porsche Cayman review
We hope you found this information helpful. This content is intended to inform and is not meant to indicate that a particular vehicle is currently available or recommended for you.
Statements of fuel economy or EV range are based on EPA and other third-party estimates for vehicles when new. Fuel economy and EV range will degrade with time and vary based on age, driving conditions, vehicle history, and other conditions. See fueleconomy.gov for more info.
Unless otherwise noted, information related to featured vehicles comes from third-party sources, including manufacturer information. Product and company names may be trademarks or registered trademarks of third-party entities. Use of them does not imply any affiliation with or endorsement by these entities. By clicking on any video links, you will be taken to a third-party site maintained by YouTube, Inc.
We make every effort to provide accurate information, but please verify before purchasing.